Видео

2*2=4. And repeat for each replicator. Yes, every single one of them counts as different deathrattle.

@@Skrek-qw1jz oh I get it now. He explains in another video. The macaw triggers EACH deathrattle on a minion so they stack. I was thinking one minion, one deathrattle. Crazy!

That triggered me so much.

@@rever6612 yea this is also the reason why Macaw is even viable in this comp, otherwise it would be too inconsistent

@@rever6612 haha me 2 :D he got handed a ferrari and he drove it like a old fiat :D

not just that if he knew he was going to go mcaw + ghoul he needed to stack all deathrattles into one unit instead he spread them out.

This was painful to watch

So far from exodia. I pulled off a double golden run with some good rolls and kel'thuzad.

Exodia means instawin and uncounterable lol. This is far from exodia

​This is uncountarable, every time I went in this strategy I was top 1 and 1 time I lost bc other player had Holden one with Golden rivender and I had just golden one without rivender

Nah, remove the "PERMANENTLY" part and you'll be good to go. Honestly, I quitted the game for 2 years now. I still can't believe how things didn't move that much. I can recall most lf these minions, heroes and game mechanics in general. It isn't appealing anymore.

With +1/+1 with would still be busted with death rattle stacking, make it death rattle minion and keep it +2/+2

@@inorganicphosphate9755 make it a minion? What's that mean hahaha

I think that either +1/+1 or removing permanent will make this card a full trash. I mean, to be honest this isn't the strongest strategy in a game and the main reason why this strategy is great is its cheapness.

@@swdwwdwd9956 I'm not suggesting removing permanent, merely suggesting that the deathrattle minion has to die rather than it working on just being triggered

Tavern spells are here to stay. That's official. If you don't like them, feel free to continue to stay away.

Why they should do that? They add some new spells.

Use Aha music. It surprisingly worked for me

You sound like someone who bursts into tears when someone smiles at them

Don't you do it, you're gonna make him make that vid

@@tsundude4320 I'd enjoy that one lol

​@@em3sisThose 700 hp demon quilboars are sick. Many times They carried me the game. Love them.

@@furiousinsects6386 i love that battlegrounds still leave counters to everything, its very well done imo

it'n not even nearly as much stats

​@@askar_arystanbayev In terms of raw stats (attack+health), yes. But the board wouldn't be less strong, especially because your Cleaves have much more attack. For example, keeping Defiant Shipwright gives you stats, but it is just a shitty do-nothing-card, while Gunpowder and Peggy (that he had to sell early) buff all other minions, maybe you can include a golden Underhanded Dealer as well. Also you don't have to spend money early on leveling to 6. There are many dogdog videos on how strong that was before this patch. My point is not that it was a misplay, but that the board strenght came from the combination of Hero Power plus early Tethys plus Cleave, NOT from the new 6-drop, as the title may suggest. Thus, this game is not the reason why Greymanes Champion should be nerfed. There are other games that are, of course.

​@@YTTYYTTY42 I feel like this was also a lack of not having enough money which ended being just a decent showcase. The second tethys was sold instead of played. Second tethys could have been used to farm more 6 drops + spend more money with balladist. Defiant Shipright also gives less stats than peggy. Golden version is +0/+2 vs +2/+2. Plus the stats are more concentrated more useful cards. Time is money which means time spent not doing anything is stats wasted. There should have been no reason to not go infinite as Hogarr + pirates. I do believe a golden greymane is better than gunpowder/peggy/brann+balladist counterparts. +4/+4 to potentially 5 units which is +20/+20 every card played. And you are still getting value from balladist but half without brann. Plus more money is more divine shield. Also could have spared money for a better ending unit.

@@2chu4you16 Surely Graymane is better, it's absurdly overpowered. I was just saying that, although it gave lots of stats, it wasn't the reason for winning here, like the title suggested. At the point it came into play, it was just a win-more-card.